When Government Asks for Trust, Leadership by Example, and Truth Matter – Mary T. O’Sullivan

By Mary T. O’Sullivan, contributing writer

“The leader sees leadership as responsibility rather than as rank and privilege.”
— Peter Drucker

Trust in government is wearing thin, not because citizens have become cynical, but because too many public leaders are asking for trust they have not earned, through example or through speaking the truth.

Across federal, state, and local institutions, leaders ask the public to accept sacrifice: fiscal cuts, rules compliance, and resilience under economic pressure. They invoke crisis and complexity to justify difficult situations. But too often, those appeals are paired with partial explanations, softened language, or outright lies. Honesty feels conditional. This circumstance is not merely a failure of messaging. It is a failure of truth.

In democratic systems, authority rests not only on law but on legitimacy. And legitimacy depends on conduct and on honest leadership. Citizens watch how leaders behave when rules are inconvenient, when accountability is uncomfortable, and when telling the truth would require admitting being wrong. When leaders manage truth instead of dealing with reality, trust erodes.

Recent events in Minnesota underscore how quickly credibility frays when truth is not delivered. In a series of high-profile immigration enforcement actions involving federal agents, conflicting accounts from officials, community members, and local leaders fueled confusion, anger, and protest. The public response was shaped less by ideology than by a basic question: Why were we not told the full truth, promptly and plainly, about what happened ?  When governments answer evasively or without truth at all, public trust collapses in real time.

This issue is not only about immigration policy. It is about what happens when leaders withhold facts, minimize harm, or defer accountability in moments involving government power and human consequence. In those moments, truthfulness is not optional. It is the foundation of legitimate leadership.

George Washington understood this fragility when he warned that “the power under the Constitution will always be in the people.” Leaders who behave as if power flows downward often treat truth as a tactical choice rather than a civic duty. But when reality is warped for convenience or politics, legitimacy weakens at its source.

Leadership by example has always been the genesis of public confidence. Truthfulness is central to that example. It signals respect for the public’s intelligence and moral agency. It affirms that citizens can handle complexity and hardship when they are treated as participants rather than audiences influencing Nielson ratings.

The 2020 pandemic made this dynamic unmistakable. Citizens were asked to comply with extraordinary measures in the name of the common good. Many did. Confidence faltered not simply because guidance evolved, but because leaders sometimes failed to speak honestly about uncertainty, trade-offs, and mistakes, or to model the discipline they demanded. The issue was not disagreement. It was credibility. Leadership without example is not leadership. And leadership without truth is not authority. It is administration built on managed political narratives.

Peter Drucker warned that leadership is defined not by position but by responsibility. Responsibility includes telling the truth when it contradicts the message, weakens the optics, or carries political risk. It means resisting the temptation to substitute a separate storyline for honesty.

Yet modern public leadership too often rewards bravado over candor and control over clarity. Leaders are trained to project certainty, even when certainty is unwarranted. But trust does not grow from  image. It grows from consistency between what leaders say, what they do, and what people see with their own eyes.

People are not asking for perfection. They are asking for truthfulness, spoken clearly and reinforced by the example they see coming from the top. They want leaders who will hold themselves to the same standards they  expect of others, and who will tell the truth even when it disrupts their political timeline. Leadership today faces a clear moral test. Those entrusted with power can continue to manage the truth, or they can earn trust through example, restraint, and honesty.

In government, trust is not sustained by authority or persuasion; it survives only when leaders tell the truth plainly, accept the consequences of their choices, and remember that power borrowed from the people can be withdrawn just as easily.

“Public service is a public trust.”— Harry S. Truman

___

Connect with Mary:

Mary T. O’Sullivan, Master of Science, Organizational Leadership, International Coaching Federation Professional Certified Coach, Society of Human Resource Management, “Senior Certified Professional. Graduate Certificate in Executive and Professional Career Coaching, University of Texas at Dallas.

Member, Beta Gamma Sigma, the International Honor Society. Advanced Studies in Education from Montclair University, SUNY Oswego and Syracuse University. Mary is also a certified Six Sigma Specialist, Contract Specialist, IPT Leader and holds a Certificate in Essentials of Human Resource Management from SHRM.contributing writer, business leadership.