Categories

Subscribe!

Person typing on a laptop with a smartphone nearby on a desk.

Note to Bosses: Don’t Fire People on Social Media – Mary T. O’Sullivan

By Mary T. O’Sullivan, MSOL contributing writer on business and leadershp

“…and if you’re sneaking around conducting the search covertly, you’re almost definitely going to compromise your ability to do that [to attract the best talent pool].” – Alison Green in Inc. Magazine

At least once in every working person’s life, they’ll be let go from their job. There are numerous reasons to fire or layoff employees, but if improperly handled, the termination style you choose can lead to more trouble later. Studies have shown that people have been let go in ways that were careless, cruel, or downright cowardly.

There are multiple cases of improper termination conversations that led directly to lawsuits, like threatening to “see that you never work in this industry again”. Or more recently, at the Justice Department, the employee’s computer powers down in the middle of the workday, followed by delivery of a termination letter. Haven’t we all heard of employee badges no longer working in card readers, names on parking spots removed, the person’s email account is deleted, IT access goes away, and their calls go unanswered? Ghosting employees in this way is unprofessional and just plain sloppy.

Other reasons include blaming the employee for the supervisor’s own mistakes. Believe it or not, many supervisors project their own failures onto a particular employee. There are tales of supervisors who project their own disorganization or mismanagement onto the employee, rewriting the reality of their failures to save face, side stepping blame. Also, humiliating people in public makes the supervisor look weak; escorting someone out of the office in front of coworkers or telling an employee off in a meeting turns termination into a spectacle, which no one wants to witness. It’s a bad look for the supervisor and the company.

And then there is the surprise firing, when there’s been no feedback, no discussion, and suddenly—boom, you’re out. It feels like a betrayal because it is. Maybe there was a miscommunication, missed phone call, ignored voicemail,  email going to spam. Before a firing decision is made, every attempt to connect with the employee should be made. People are not mind readers. If you want to let someone go, have the professional and common courtesy to inform them.

What’s it like to open your email and discover a laundry list of performance issues with a closing note that you’re no longer part of the team? Or worse, a text pops up telling you due to “poor performance”, without any explanation, you are out. Unless there is some kind of threat involved, firing a person via email or text is cold, lazy, and unacceptable. And about as impersonal as it comes.

The same goes for firing a person who is on vacation. This practice seems like another level of disrespect, however  even though you may feel devalued and affronted,  it’s not illegal. Most states in the United States are “at-will” employment states, which means your employer (or you) can fire you at any time, without cause. Unless you can prove that the action is retaliatory, you are out of luck. Come in and pack up your boxes and be happy you’re no longer in that toxic environment.

For people in higher education, especially for adjuncts, the reasons for termination become even foggier. Lack of notice for contract non-renewal without transparency or adequate notice makes the job feel even more inconsequential and unimportant than the standard paltry pay. Without clear and detailed reasons for why an adjunct’s contract is not being renewed, it’s more difficult for the adjunct to address performance issues or clearly understand the administrator’s decision.  One of the major drivers of terminating an adjunct is often over reliance on student feedback. While student evaluations can offer some valuable understanding, using them as the major or sole basis for termination is tricky, as students can easily be influenced by factors beyond an adjunct’s control. Until you actually speak to your adjunct, you are treating them unfairly.

The biggest blow to a person’s confidence, self-worth, and well-being is finding out they’ve been replaced on social media. Imagine the shock of checking an Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, or X account to see their replacement’s employment announcement! The reverberations from the resulting distress can last for weeks. Uncertainty and anxiety increase, and morale and trust erode among other employees as well as the target. It certainly has a negative impact on the reputation of the organization as word cycles through, especially if the person is well known and highly thought of in the industry and the community.

Poor termination practices leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth. They not only damage people’s lives and corrode the culture, employee morale, and the organization’s reputation. Firing employees without dignity, due process, or clear communication undermines trust, invites legal risk, and signals a failure of leadership. Terminations can’t always be avoided; they are a part of the workplace. But when terminations are carried out carelessly, cruelly, and with laziness, it  acts as a blot on the employer’s integrity. Organizations committed to long-term success must ensure that their termination practices reflect the same values they promote on their websites and in their mission statements—fairness, transparency, and respect.

“Managers that are too cowardly to talk to their employees about behavior that they don’t like until they have talked themselves up to firing the employees… well they shouldn’t be managers, and they certainly aren’t leaders!” – Anonymous

___

 

Mary T. O’Sullivan, Master of Science, Organizational Leadership, International Coaching Federation Professional Certified Coach, Society of Human Resource Management, “Senior Certified Professional. Graduate Certificate in Executive and Professional Career Coaching, University of Texas at Dallas.

Member, Beta Gamma Sigma, the International Honor Society.

Advanced Studies in Education from Montclair University, SUNY Oswego and Syracuse University.

Mary is also a certified Six Sigma Specialist, Contract Specialist, IPT Leader and holds a Certificate in Essentials of Human Resource Management from SHRM.

 

Mary T. O’Sullivan, MSOL, ICF-PCC, SHRM-SCP,  BCC
Hogan Assessment Practitioner
EQi2.0-EQ360 Practitioner
Appreciative Inquiry Practitioner
Six Sigma Specialist, Certified IPT Leader, Certified Contracts Manager
Helping good leaders get even better through positive behavior change.
401-742-1965
 
 
Serving  leaders in business, tech, medical, legal, and higher education seeking leadership development and personal growth.

Leave a Comment