Search Posts
Recent Posts
- Gimme’ Shelter: Meet Hubbell, at the Providence Animal Control Center May 18, 2025
- Dig into Gardening, you’ll harvest more than zucchinis – Marilynn Preston May 18, 2025
- NAACP Providence Branch now under the control of the NAACP national office. It only took 4 years. May 18, 2025
- Ask Chef Walter: Beef Tallow, forgotten super-fat reclaiming its place – Chef Walter Potenza May 18, 2025
- Former President Joe Biden diagnosed with aggressive, metastasized prostate cancer May 18, 2025
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.

State Legislature may sink one of Rhode Island’s most successful industries – Nick Landekic
by Nick Landekic, contributing writer – op-ed
It’s no secret that state budgets are under painfully increasing pressures with cuts in federal support and funding. Rhode Island is particularly at risk being the second largest per capita recipient of federal money, and a proposed state budget that naively assumes $5.1 billion – 36% of the total – will come from the federal government.
To expect the Trump administration will send Rhode Island over $5 billion is untethered from reality. It’s no surprise our state legislators are frantically looking for new sources of revenues – meaning, new taxes. In the process they may destroy one of our largest and most successful industries.
The legislature is currently considering H.B. 6256, a proposal to reinstate both the sales tax and ongoing property tax on boats in Rhode Island, reversing a wise decision in 1993 for exemption. This is important for everyone even if you don’t have a boat. Let’s take a closer look why.
Because Rhode Island’s industrial base was declining state leaders in 1993 astutely decided to create a tax exemption to spur the growth of the marine industry.
It was wildly successful.
The marine economy in Rhode Island now has 2,435 businesses and employs 41,174 employees, and generates $2.65 billion in annual sales. The marine industry accounts for $1.3 billion in wages and contributes $3.3 billion to the state’s GDP.
Many premier boat builders located here, along with dozens of successful marinas and hundreds of related businesses including boatyards, repair services, marine supply stores, even restaurants and bars. Boaters who keep their boats in Rhode Island also patronize and spend money in local stores and on fuel.
The only reason there are so many boats and related business in Rhode Island is the favorable tax treatment. All of this would be jeopardized by a boat sales or property tax, risking the loss of tens of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars of economic impact from boaters spending on marine and related goods and services.
Reinstating the sales and property tax would likely result in many of the boats and related businesses leaving Rhode Island. Remove the favorable tax treatment and there would remain no compelling reasons why marine business and sales should take place in Rhode Island rather than Massachusetts or Connecticut. You need to give businesses a reason to be here, and that reason has been favorable tax treatment.
Reinstating a sales and property tax on boats will probably not raise significant revenues. Boat sales are already declining because of economic anxiety caused by Donald Trump’s damaging and irrational actions. Reinstating a tax will only further decrease them, and any illusory revenues some think could be realized.
Commercial fishermen and others who rely on the water for their livelihoods, already struggling with increased costs, would be hurt by an annual property tax. How many would be forced out of business? Everyday Rhode Islanders who enjoy boating might have to give it up – and stop spending money and contributing to the state economy – if an annual property tax is added to already high expenses.
The lost jobs, lost income tax from all those employees, sales taxes from sales of marine goods and services related to boats, and lost jobs, revenues, and taxes from all the many associated restaurants and other businesses would dwarf any minimal revenues that might be realized from a sales and property tax.
The hard truth is Rhode Island is economically weak with few natural resources, few major businesses, and few nationally recognized universities. Rhode Island ranks dead last among the 50 states for attractiveness to start a business. The state’s performance across many measures is dismal: the worst public health record of all states in managing the pandemic (per capita), the worst road conditions of all states, the highest proportion of structurally unsound bridges, and the highest proportion of its population of all New England states relying on Medicaid benefits. One of the few bright spots in the state economy is the marine industry.
Our legislature will not be able to tax its way out of our financial predicament. The issue is not insufficient tax revenues. The unpleasant reality is grossly inefficient spending due to the state’s endemic and ingrained graft, corruption and waste.
Per capita Rhode Island spends about 50% more than Massachusetts yet has a state GDP that is about 50% less than Massachusetts. We spend more per capita than many other states yet have less to show for it and with greater needs and problems. The reason is because much of the money gets wasted in Rhode Island, on graft, personal pet projects, inflated no-bid contracts, unnecessary spending, and corruption.
If Rhode Island’s per capita state spending was closer to that of Massachusetts or Connecticut the total state budget would be about $9 billion – and, importantly, would not rely on federal subsidies and would not require any increases in taxes. Learning from Massachusetts and other states could improve our quality of life while at the same time spending less money – if the money were to be used more efficiently.

In 2019 Governor Gina Raimondo achieved a balanced state budget with a total spend of about $9 billion. This laudable achievement is what our legislators must work towards getting back to.
In many cases a sales tax on boats could be justified – but not in Rhode Island. Reinstating a boat sales and property tax here will not accomplish what is needed and will painfully backfire and have the opposite effect. ‘Soaking the rich’ makes for pithy sound bites and may attract some votes – until thousands of people start losing their jobs.
Changing Rhode Island’s culture will take time but is the only way the state will survive the new reality of the Trump administration. In the meantime our legislators should objectively look at the facts. Passing H.B.6256 will only increase unemployment, cause businesses and people to leave the state, decrease net state tax receipts, and decimate the marine industry and destroy one of the most successful business segments in the state.
If you have any feelings on this write to your state representatives and let them know. If they’re not part of the solution, then they’re part of the problem.
—————-
Nick Landekic of Bristol is a retired C.E.O. and biotechnology entrepreneur who has spent more than 35 years working in the pharmaceutical industry.
Seriously the bigger question is why is the RI State budget $14 billion to begin with? That is an outrageous amount for such a small State. The Plandemic is over cutback.
It’s useful to compare the budgets of Rhode Island and Maine. Both states have almost identical per capital GDP, about $70/person. However, the state of Maine’s per capita budget is only $5,125 vs. Rhode Island’s at $12,766 – more than double.
The total state budget is $14.2 billion for Rhode Island vs. $7.2 billion for Maine. Again, we spend double both per capita and in total. One could argue that Maine’s costs should be proportionately higher than Rhode Island’s because the state is 30 times larger.
Despite spending less than half per capita of Rhode Island, many of Maine’s performance metrics are superior to Rhode Island – public health (pandemic performance), road conditions, bridge conditions, public schools.
A similar comparison can be made with Massachusetts. Rhode Island spends about 50% more per capita yet has worse performance in most measures.
The bottom line is Rhode Island spends far more than a number of other states, including New England neighbors, yet has much less to show for it. If we brought our spending in line with Massachusetts or Maine the state budget would be in the range of $7-$9 billion and not $14 billion – and our quality of life could be much better if the money was spent more efficiently, instead of the traditional graft and waste the state is known for.
not surprised wealthy boat owners want someone else to pay sales taxes, such as people who buy cars, bicycles. Every industry could make the same claim for exemptions, but boat purchasers also demand a lot of support to keep the water clean, to rescue those who get in trouble etc
right on. what is the state’s projected deficit? why do we consifer new taxes before we have data on the projected deficit?
The proposed FY 2025 budget from Gov. McKee is $14 billion. Officially the projected deficit is $400 million – but that assumes Rhode Island will receive $5.1 billion from the federal government. That represents 36% of the total state budget.
I think it is unrealistic to except the Trump administration will send Rhode Island over $5 billion. The administration has already signaled a number of state cuts and clawbacks. In actuality Rhode Island may see little of that.
If you assume the federal government were to provide no money to Rhode Island then the actual budget deficit would be closer to $5.5 billion ($5.1 billion + $400 million). I believe this is why legislators are scrambling looking for more tax dollars.
If Rhode Island brought its spending in line with Massachusetts (on a per capita basis) the total state budget would be balanced at about $9 billion. Former Gov. Gina Raimondo achieved this impressive and important accomplishment back in 2019. Whether our legislature likes it or not, this is what we must work towards getting back to, finding a way to be self-sufficient and independent of relying on federal financial support.
Again following Massachusetts lead we could spend less money, but if it is spent more efficiently we could achieve much more for it. Massachusetts’ performance surpasses Rhode Island’s across many measures – while spending 50% less per capita than we do.
Unfortunately, the legislature is considering this misguided measure. H.B. 6256 would reinstate both a sales tax and an annual property tax on boats. It would be killing the goose that’s laying golden eggs, and would likely decimate the most successful industry in the state.