Categories

Subscribe!

A forest with tall trees in the background.

Speaking for the trees: New path for forest stewardship needed – op-ed, Rep. Megan Cotter

By Rep. Megan L. Cotter, submitted to RINewsToday as an op-ed commentary

Fifty-four percent of Rhode Island is forested, which is impressive considering it’s the second-most densely populated state in the nation. It’s also quite a resurgence; by the mid-1700s, settlers’ agriculture had reduced tree cover in the area to just 31 percent, down from 95 percent before their arrival a century earlier.

While Rhode Island has long recognized the value of forests, establishing its Forest Commission back in 1906, today we are not giving forest stewardship the priority it deserves.

This is evident in the increasing frequency and severity of forest fires. In April, 350 acres were scorched by a wildfire that began in Queen’s River Preserve in Exeter. Fortunately no one was hurt and no homes caught fire, thanks to the great work of many local firefighters, but it was Rhode Island’s largest forest fire since 1942. And it was less than a week after another fire burned more than 150 acres at the Big River Management Area in West Greenwich. Several smaller forest fires also burned that week, fueled by dry conditions and dead wood.

Of course, this problem isn’t unique to Rhode Island. Our neighbors in Canada have been besieged by record-shattering wildfires this year, billowing so much smoke so far that it triggered air quality alerts here, and even reached Europe.

The fact is, our climate is changing. Hotter, dryer conditions and more frequent extreme weather present new challenges to maintaining our forests. We need to adapt to this new reality with a new and more vigorous approach to forest management.

This session I sponsored legislation (2023-H 6342) creating a new House commission to determine the best action for improving forest management. Our commission, which began working this week, brings together experts and stakeholders to identify our strengths and weaknesses, and how our state can best direct our resources toward effective forest management in our increasingly volatile environment.

We need to engage in more modern, effective means of maintaining our forests, much of which are privately held land. That means we must work as partners with landowners, helping them safely manage the risks of fires, for their benefit and the safety of the public. We should collaborate with land trusts and conservation organizations, many of which already engage in outstanding stewardship practices and can provide valuable guidance.

Putting in the planning and maintenance work necessary to prevent forest fires has benefits far beyond public safety. Forests directly reduce carbon dioxide from our atmosphere, play a major role in filtering pollution from our groundwater and cool the land in the summer. Of course, they provide many intangible benefits too, as any hiker or kid in a tree fort will attest.

Forest management is not just for the wider expanses in the western part of our state. Urban trees are just as critical, providing vital stormwater control and cooling during the summer. According to the U.S. Forest Service, Providence found that its 415,000 trees provide $4.7 million in environmental benefits annually, and a study of five U.S. cities has shown that every dollar invested in urban forest management results in benefits ranging from $1.37 to $3.09. 

Keeping our forests healthy and encouraging the conservation of forested land should be a high priority for Rhode Island. I look forward to helping to forge a new path forward toward better forest stewardship in our state.

Rep. Megan L. Cotter (D-Dist. 39, Exeter, Richmond, Hopkinton) is chairwoman of the Special Legislative Commission to Evaluate and Provide Recommendations on Proper Forest Management for Fire Prevention.

___

Posted in

2 Comments

  1. Jeff Gross on September 16, 2023 at 3:41 pm

    Action must be taken. We must stop building useless strip malls (that often remain vacant) and deforesting the state by adding counterproductive solar panel farms.



    • Jenny Smith on September 16, 2023 at 10:45 pm

      I am all for forest management. Wasn’t the forest fire in April mentioned here started by DEM and it got out of control? DEM is also apparently allowing logging and claiming that sections of forest must be cut but then do not properly restore with native trees. This proposal is concerning because it doesn’t clarify how one would improve forest management. DEM is an organization that is not transparent enough and not always clear on it’s values. For instance, the organization is notoriously lax on enforcing compliance with rules and seems to offer leniency toward developers/environmental bad actors. Is this a dog whistle to clear cutting as an excuse for forest management? I hope not.