Search Posts
Recent Posts
- Real Estate in RI: $2.13M Little Compton Cottage with RPL’s Amy Chafee for Sellers December 8, 2025
- Our Networking Pick of the Week: Multi-Chamber Holiday Business After Hours December 8, 2025
- Rhode Island Weather for December 8, 2025 – a “B-” Day! December 8, 2025
- Congress Moves on a National Anti-Scam Strategy to Protect Older Adults – Herb Weiss December 8, 2025
- It’s Time to Rethink Office Gift-Giving: Mary T. O’Sullivan December 8, 2025
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
UPDATE: Wind Turbine Blade Flies Off into Cranberry Bog in Plymouth, Fuels Wind Power Concerns
Photo, top, from Plymouth, MA Fire Department Website
UPDATE: From the Plymouth Independent: “RWE, the company that owns the project, says it’s already begun an “exhaustive” analysis of the incident with Spanish company Siemens Gamesa, which built and maintains the equipment. “The project has been shut down as a precaution, and the other three turbines at the site were also shut down,” Patricia Kakridas, a spokesperson for RWE, said in an email. “Once it is determined the site is safe, work will begin to remove the fallen blade.” The Dept. of Energy says that a mid-cycling blade failure of this nature is nearly impossible – yet that is what happened.
There are four wind turbines at the cranberry bog location. The blade that flew off into the bog is approximately the size of a 10-story building. All four are not operating – local officials talk about the fact that all the turbines were put up about a decade ago and there needs to be assurances that whatever failure happened will not befall others. The fallen blade remains in the bog.
___
A massive wind turbine blade broke free and flew into a cranberry bog in Plymouth on Friday afternoon, prompting an emergency response, state notification, and a safety investigation into what caused the failure.
Plymouth Fire Chief Neil Foley reported that firefighters responded to 810 Head of the Bay Road at about 2 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 7, after a concerned neighbor noticed that one of the three blades on a 300-foot-tall wind turbine was suddenly missing.
Crews found the detached 75- to 100-foot-long blade several hundred feet from the base of the turbine, in multiple pieces in an open cranberry bog. The site is remote, bordered by wetlands and agricultural fields, with no homes or occupied buildings nearby. No injuries were reported.
The bog property is described as a 468-acre cranberry farm spanning Plymouth, Bourne and Wareham, with approximately 150 acres of high-yielding bogs. Records indicate it is owned by Garland Nye Realty Trust (Trustee Keith Mann). The turbine is sited under lease to Future Generation Wind, LLC (c/o ConEdison Solutions), generating what is described in documents as “renewable energy income” from large-scale wind and solar installations.
According to the maintenance company responsible for the turbine, the equipment’s fail-safe mode activated automatically, shutting the system down immediately after the blade detached. The company has cordoned off the area, begun engineering inspections, and is arranging for specialized contractors to remove the damaged blade and debris from the bog.
Chief Foley said both the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) and the Town of Plymouth’s Inspectional Services Department were notified and will oversee environmental and structural reviews.
“We were fortunate that this turbine is located out in the middle of the cranberry bogs and not in a residential area,” said Chief Foley. “Thankfully, no one was hurt, and the turbine automatically shut itself down as designed. As we continue to investigate, MassDEP and Inspectional Services will now do their due diligence to ensure this incident is addressed appropriately and the impacted area is cleaned up safely.”
The turbine—part of a cluster of renewable-energy installations along Head of the Bay Road—has been in service for several years. While rare, blade-detachment incidents can occur due to fatigue, imbalance, or manufacturing failure, and are typically reviewed under federal and state energy-safety protocols.
A global estimate in 2015 found about 3,800 rotor‐blade failures per year, a relatively small fraction of the 700,000 blades operating worldwide—but many more turbines have been built in the past decade, increasing the potential exposure to aging or defective components.
This is not the first case of a turbine blade detaching in Massachusetts. Just this summer, in July 2024, a 115,000-pound blade on the Vineyard Wind 1 offshore project south of Nantucket broke apart, scattering debris into the ocean and washing fiberglass fragments onto island beaches. The incident triggered a federal shutdown and a $10.5 million settlement with manufacturer GE Vernova after the failure was traced to a manufacturing defect.
In a related development on Nov. 4, 2025, a federal judge ruled that the SouthCoast Wind project—a planned 2.4 GW offshore wind farm off Massachusetts—must undergo a new review of its federal permit, injecting uncertainty into its timeline and highlighting growing regulatory risk in the wind industry.
While the Plymouth on-shore blade detachment triggered a local safety response, the SouthCoast Wind case underscores that for offshore projects, regulatory oversight and permits pose an equally potent risk of interruption.
Industry Reconsiderations and a Shifting Wind
The wind industry—once seen as the unstoppable engine of clean energy—has entered a period of pause and reassessment. Across New England, developers face a convergence of challenges: mechanical reliability, permitting delays, and cost pressures from rising interest rates and supply-chain inflation. Major offshore projects such as SouthCoast Wind are under federal review, and others—including Commonwealth Wind and Revolution Wind 2—have been scaled back or renegotiated as financial projections shift.
Industry analysts say the combination of public-safety scrutiny following events like the Plymouth blade detachment and legal uncertainty around federal approvals could push developers to redesign, delay, or divest from projects. What was once viewed as a rapid march toward renewable dominance is now being tempered by lessons in maintenance, transparency, and local impact. For coastal and rural communities alike, the question is no longer if wind power will expand—but how safely, how visibly, and under whose oversight it will proceed.
“Offshore wind … will continue with the ongoing Vineyard Wind project, and we will wait and see on what comes next,” said Gordon Carr, Executive Director of the New Bedford Wind Energy Center (Port of New Bedford).
“I said to my team, the project in New York—we’ll see that in four years,” said TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné regarding the company’s Attentive Energy offshore project. “But the advantage is it’s only for four years.”
TotalEnergies SE, a French multinational energy company and one of the world’s largest oil and gas producers, has in recent years diversified heavily into renewables, including wind, solar, and battery storage.
Major offshore developers such as Ørsted are likewise scaling back or pausing expansion into newer markets—including Australia—while maintaining existing licenses, citing cost pressures, supply-chain disruptions, and regulatory uncertainty.
The failed blade was within the designed set back range for blade failure, so it is not surprising that there was no damage to property or life.
What is the “designed setback range”?