Search Posts
Recent Posts
- Silver Wave of Older Voters Important in Midterm Elections – Herb Weiss October 19, 2026
- Rhode Island Weather for October 19, 2026 October 19, 2026
- Business Beat: Navigant CU promotes Lori Jordan to Sr. VP, Chief People and Philanthropy Officer October 19, 2026
- UFL unveils Rhode Island Breakers branding—but why so similar to URI’s trademarked Rhody Rams October 19, 2026
- Business Monday: Change is the Only Constant – Bob Salvas October 19, 2026
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Inside the Lindsay Clancy Jury Room: Jurors Explain Why They Couldn’t Reach a Verdict (VIDEO)
Three members of the jury in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial are describing the deliberations that ended in a mistrial—and the disagreement they say prevented a verdict.
In an exclusive interview with NBC10 Boston’s Sue O’Connell, foreperson Roni Carlson and fellow jurors Paula Devlin and Kellie Farina discussed the evidence, the attorneys and their struggle to reach agreement.
According to their account, three jurors were persuaded during deliberations to support a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. One remained opposed. Carlson said that juror acknowledged reasonable doubt but still would not agree to acquittal.
Their descriptions represent the perspectives of the jurors interviewed. NBC10 Boston reported that it had attempted to contact the holdout juror.
Watch NBC10 Boston’s coverage below.