Search Posts
Recent Posts
- Know Your Numbers: Checking Cholesterol Could Save Your Life – Christopher Ottiano, MD, Neighborhood Health Plan September 29, 2026
- More than 600 Rhode Islanders Helped at Mission of Mercy Free Dental Clinic September 29, 2026
- ART! Imago exhibit explores architecture of community, fractals and order of the universe September 29, 2026
- How Rhode Island can turn Civic Friendship into Hope – Vincent Marzullo, commentary September 29, 2026
- Rhode Island Weather for September 29, 2026 September 29, 2026
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Inside the Lindsay Clancy Jury Room: Jurors Explain Why They Couldn’t Reach a Verdict (VIDEO)
Three members of the jury in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial are describing the deliberations that ended in a mistrial—and the disagreement they say prevented a verdict.
In an exclusive interview with NBC10 Boston’s Sue O’Connell, foreperson Roni Carlson and fellow jurors Paula Devlin and Kellie Farina discussed the evidence, the attorneys and their struggle to reach agreement.
According to their account, three jurors were persuaded during deliberations to support a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. One remained opposed. Carlson said that juror acknowledged reasonable doubt but still would not agree to acquittal.
Their descriptions represent the perspectives of the jurors interviewed. NBC10 Boston reported that it had attempted to contact the holdout juror.
Watch NBC10 Boston’s coverage below.