Search Posts
Recent Posts
- Rhode Island Weather for December 30, 2024 – Jack Donnelly December 30, 2024
- Working over the holidays – Mary T. O’Sullivan December 30, 2024
- “Celebrate Safely” – Sheeley Law offers Rhode Islanders $10 Uber vouchers for New Year’s Eve December 30, 2024
- Historic Social Security legislation awaits President’s signature – Herb Weiss December 30, 2024
- Jimmy Carter, 39th President of the US, dies at 100 – the president of human rights and peace December 30, 2024
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
Update: Cranston vote against pallet shelters a tie. Governor must meet with all mayors. Other…
PHOTO: Sample Pallet Shelter village in western US
The Cranston City Council considered a resolution to request Governor McKee not locate pallet housing on the grounds of the city-located, state-owned Pastore Center. Amid some passionate testimony, the vote came down 4-4 which requires a moot result and the resolution did not pass. This does not mean the city voted for or voted against asking the Governor to not locate pallet housing in Cranston.
The confusion over a tie vote was obvious as NBC10 reported early Tuesday that Cranston voted against pallet housing in the city. ABC6 accurately reported that a tie left no decision on the resolution.
Two spokespeople from the RI Homeless Coalition and House of Hope gave brief statements that pallet housing is necessary. Other homeless advocates said earlier in the day that it is too late to do this for this year, but next year pallet shelters will be coming to locations in Rhode Island as yet to be determined.
These two clips (click on link) are of Councilwoman Aniece Germain about moving forward with empathy on the homeless issue:
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxas3_ij0WIVekDyQIpT2CkH8o4bcOp5pz
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxn6wF-lIx6OyGd_x7gYuByjNdMuqdElYw
UPDATE: Cranston Mayor says there is also a building on Reservoir Avenue with 40 prisoners who were released and are sex offenders – and that building needs to be monitored as well, with police officers allocated just for that purpose. He made suggestions of Charlestown rural areas, Quonset, Narragansett, etc. that also have hygiene resources, unavailable elsewhere.
Other Developments:
Moving to Warwick, Motel 6 will now have approximately 40 people take up residence there as a temporary shelter use.
Smithfield will have a motel taken over by a Woonsocket-based agency for a full housing program for approximately 70 people, including wrap-around services.
Deadline for RI State House – The homeless at the state house have said the RI Capitol Police have told them they will be removed on December 1st if they do not leave first. Spokesperson Chris Raia for the Housing Czar Josh Saal said he knew of no deadline. The Governor’s Christmas Tree lighting ceremony will take place tomorrow, November 30th with song, food, and entertainment – and a tree lighting. Some activists have said they intend for the homeless there to come into the building to participate.
Pawtucket Police Station – reports that a few people have come into the station – one of four warming centers – and maybe one person may have stayed the night – as they are now open 24/7 for those in need.
TODAY – The state properties committee will consider taking over a building on Hartford Avenue to turn into a homeless shelter. The building is currently vacant and owned by BHDDH.
This is a developing story.
I would like more people to see this picture. There is no access for emergency vehicles. If these are temporary, as is being claimed, they certainly don’t look temporary. There seems to be quite a bit of trash.
It’s easy to say ”put them up” but no one has addressed the infrastructure. Land needs to be leveled, electricity has to be wired, connections to sewers, etc. One can’t just plop down a building and say “here you go. you have a home”.
The advocates (bless them for the work they do!) haven’t looked any further than putting a roof over their heads. There are no baths, no place to cook and a communal building for these would need to be built. Right there, we’ve taken the “temporary” out of the picture. There will be a structure that will be permanent.
The area needs paving, trash pickup, lighting, and a host of other amenities.
The housing has a roof and sides. How are they heated? Who is going to pay for the utilities every month?
Some do have cars – where do they park?
I’ve yet to see anyone ask these questions and there are many more.
Putting a house up in an hour is the easy part – it’s a feel-good bandaid that says “something is better than nothing”. It doesn’t go to the root of homelessness nor should it.
We’re trying to get them out of the elements & give them a safe space but the logistics of getting there aren’t being looked at.
The impact on the residents isn’t being considered yet they’re the ones who pay taxes, will be picking up trash, see their homes devalue, and yet, they, too, donate their time, money, and goods to help the less fortunate.
Those who don’t live in the area are the ones crying foul but they are the NIMBYs. It works for them since they don’t have to see or deal with it.