Search Posts
Recent Posts
- The Providence Rink opens. Sponsorship bid from Cianci Foundation rejected, cannot be revisited. December 24, 2024
- Business Beat: 27th BankRI Holiday Giving Tree brightens the season with nearly 7,000 gifts December 24, 2024
- Review of Newport Cottages, by Michael C. Kathrens – David Brussat December 24, 2024
- Rhode Island Weather for December 24, 2024 – Jack Donnelly December 24, 2024
- Sugar, lemon, nano-plastics? Polymer tea bags release millions of microplastics absorbed by body December 24, 2024
Categories
Subscribe!
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
RI House/Senate stop Consent Decree talks – Judge’s conference today – Gina Macris
By Gina Macris, Developmental Disabilities News – contributing writer
Both the Rhode Island House and Senate have withdrawn from negotiations on a three-year budget plan to overhaul the state’s developmental disabilities system and comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).
The development of such a plan had been recommended by an independent federal court monitor as part of a fiscal analysis he submitted in November to Chief Judge John J. McConnell, Jr of the U.S. District Court. McConnell oversees the state’s efforts to get into compliance with a 2014 consent decree in which the state agreed to correct violations of the ADA by 2024.
Members of the House and Senate joined the talks in December, but the leadership of both chambers of the General Assembly decided to withdraw after McConnell made the development of the three-year budget plan the topic of a court order Jan. 6.
“We are concerned that continued involvement of the Senate could be perceived as tacit approval of the entire body without the proper processes that allows for meaningful member input,” Senate President Dominic Ruggerio and Majority Leader Michael McCaffrey said in a Feb. 3 letter to McConnell.
The House used similar language in a separate letter.
Ruggerio and McCaffrey wrote, “We appreciate the work of the Court and the process by which you are moving to identify and operationalize solutions to accomplish the goals of the consent decree.”
“We anticipate that the Court will order the state to undertake a course of action, and at that time, in our role as the appropriating body, we will further engage in this process,” the Senate leadership told Judge McConnell.
Last July, McConnell ordered an overhaul of the entire developmental disabilities service system to end segregated care and encourage the integration of individuals with intellectual challenges in their communities.
In response to that July order, representatives of the state’s developmental disability agency began working with families, providers, and advocates on a 16-point agenda for reforming the way services are delivered and the rules for reimbursing the private agencies which provide direct care.
McConnell’s order on Jan. 6 focused on the budgetary implications, memorializing the main points of the monitor’s analysis, including a requirement that the state raise the wages of direct care workers to $20 an hour by Fiscal 2024.
In the same order, McConnell also said the actual costs of developmental disabilities services must be included in a state budgeting procedure known as the Caseload Estimating Conference, which allows the state to get a better handle on its financial obligations for entitlement programs.
In a statement responding to a request for specifics prompting the withdrawal, Shekarchi, newly elected Speaker of the House, said, “It would be best to answer these questions with an overall clarification that the action by the House is not a repudiationof any of the specific ideas being discussed.“
When the House was invited to join talks in December, the leadership expected that its representatives would participate in discussions about issues of concern for service providers and options for what might be included in the Governor’s upcoming budget. House leadership “was happy to have someone included,” Shekarchi said.
Because the Jan. 6 order contained “much more prescriptive policy remedies than expected, the House felt that further participation might be perceived as delegation of its legislative authority,” the statement said.
It was out of an abundance of caution that the House withdrew, he said.
The Senate leadership’s letter said it was “unclear if the Senate’s inclusion was designed to guide discussions and outcomes or merely for observation.”
Ruggerio and McCaffrey said “the Senate values continued dialogue and looks forward to reviewing any proffered solutions in an open, public committee process.”
Similarly, the letter from the House leadership said they encourage continued dialogue and “are eager to have one or more of our committees review potential solutions in an open and public process.”
Individual Senators may continue to participate in the current talks, but are acting on their own behalf and do not represent the Senate as a body, Ruggerio and McCaffrey said.
Sen. Louis DiPalma, D-Middletown, has attended the negotiations and is widely known as an advocate for the integration of adults with developmental disabilities.
McConnell, meanwhile, has scheduled a private conference Feb. 11 with the monitor, Antosh, and lawyers representing the U.S. Department of Justice, the state, and several service providers.